This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (!(bife == 9) && buon() < usous() || cer && id) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
brun();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if ((!id || !cer) && (buon() > usous() || bife == 9)) {
brun();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (sche && nel != 1 || vosti() || obru < be) {
if (obru < be) {
if (vosti()) {
if (nel != 1) {
return true;
}
}
}
if (grai()) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
return (grai() || sche) && (nel != 1 || vosti() || obru < be);
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (!sche && !grai()) {
if (nel == 1) {
return false;
}
if (!vosti()) {
return false;
}
if (obru > be) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (cec == true) {
udbe();
}
if (menk && cec != true) {
ratra();
} else if (cic == true && cec != true && !menk) {
ipesm();
} else if (en == true && cec != true && !menk && cic != true) {
larpar();
}
{
if (cec) {
udbe();
}
if (menk) {
ratra();
}
if (cic) {
ipesm();
}
if (en) {
larpar();
}
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else if, not just else.Related puzzles: