This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (racSmod() != 3 || in && seec) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
bopac();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if ((!seec || !in) && racSmod() == 3) {
bopac();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (akhe && !shal) {
if (!mio) {
if (erdue()) {
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
return erdue() || !mio || akhe && !shal;
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (!akhe && mio && !erdue()) {
if (!erdue()) {
return false;
}
if (mio) {
return false;
}
if (shal) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (ong == false) {
dedOlprel();
}
if (bedi == true && ong != false) {
sosout();
}
if (ong != false && bedi != true) {
tesm();
}
{
if (!ong) {
dedOlprel();
}
if (bedi) {
sosout();
}
tesm();
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else, no final if.Related puzzles: