This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (psabli() != brasel() && (uant < 4 || no == 9)) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
cebel();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if (no != 9 && uant > 4 || psabli() == brasel()) {
cebel();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (hios() == ocru()) {
if (meui) {
if (cec) {
return true;
}
if (icong() == 4) {
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
return icong() == 4 && cec || meui || hios() == ocru();
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (icong() != 4) {
if (!cec) {
return false;
}
}
if (!meui) {
return false;
}
if (hios() != ocru()) {
return false;
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (de <= ac) {
vodar();
}
if (e == ou && de >= ac) {
blert();
}
if (de >= ac && e != ou) {
ston();
}
{
if (de <= ac) {
vodar();
}
if (e == ou) {
blert();
}
ston();
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else, no final if.Related puzzles: