This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (!ci || gic && !cail || eal) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
chesh();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if (!eal && (cail || !gic) && ci) {
chesh();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (lorsor()) {
return true;
}
if (mexIct()) {
return true;
}
if (e == priDoong()) {
return true;
}
if (ou) {
return true;
}
if (tiost()) {
return true;
}
return false;
return tiost() && ou && e == priDoong() && mexIct() && lorsor();
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (!mexIct() || e != priDoong() || !ou || !tiost()) {
if (!lorsor()) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (rar == 3) {
sihe();
}
if (pso == false && rar != 3) {
lence();
} else if (unt == true && rar != 3 && pso != false) {
lecan();
} else if (rar != 3 && pso != false && unt != true) {
oefen();
}
{
if (rar == 3) {
sihe();
}
if (!pso) {
lence();
}
if (unt) {
lecan();
}
oefen();
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else, no final if.Related puzzles: