This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (ste != 1 || peoFlac() || eapPhenai() || oap) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
clusm();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if (!oap && !eapPhenai() && !peoFlac() && ste == 1) {
clusm();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (!ce && huc && oulVunt() || !wini) {
if (!wini) {
if (oulVunt()) {
return true;
}
}
if (huc) {
return true;
}
if (iong) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
return (iong || !ce) && huc && (oulVunt() || !wini);
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (!huc || ce && !iong) {
if (!oulVunt()) {
return false;
}
if (wini) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (an == true) {
cori();
}
if (!idal && an != true) {
formi();
}
if (o == true && an != true && idal) {
shesad();
}
if ((opar > e) == true && an != true && idal && o != true) {
oswo();
}
{
if (an) {
cori();
}
if (!idal) {
formi();
}
if (o) {
shesad();
}
if (opar > e) {
oswo();
}
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else if, not just else.Related puzzles: