This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if ((seatri() || a) && ca && prap()) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
stonid();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if (!prap() || !ca || !a && !seatri()) {
stonid();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (ar || sast) {
if (pothar()) {
return true;
}
}
if (!anac) {
return true;
}
if (!pesm) {
return true;
}
return false;
return !pesm && !anac && (pothar() || ar || sast);
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (anac || pesm) {
if (!pothar()) {
return false;
}
if (!ar) {
return false;
}
if (!sast) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (ecwe == true) {
risMuont();
} else if (stae == true && ecwe != true) {
sohec();
} else if (siil >= 2 && ecwe != true && stae != true) {
lian();
}
if (ang == erhe && ecwe != true && stae != true && siil <= 2) {
edlom();
}
{
if (ecwe) {
risMuont();
}
if (stae) {
sohec();
}
if (siil >= 2) {
lian();
}
if (ang == erhe) {
edlom();
}
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else if, not just else.Related puzzles: