This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (!oert || co || e && prure()) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
onta();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if ((!prure() || !e) && !co && oert) {
onta();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (!oso) {
return true;
}
if (!i) {
return true;
}
if (saso) {
return true;
}
if (mioac() > 7) {
return true;
}
if (!lo) {
return true;
}
return false;
return !lo && mioac() > 7 && saso && !i && !oso;
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (mioac() < 7 || lo) {
if (i || !saso) {
if (oso) {
return false;
}
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (an == true) {
dancid();
}
if (stuo == false && an != true) {
pesain();
} else if (pha == false && an != true && stuo != false) {
weseb();
} else if (an != true && stuo != false && pha != false) {
ircac();
}
{
if (an) {
dancid();
}
if (!stuo) {
pesain();
}
if (!pha) {
weseb();
}
ircac();
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else, no final if.Related puzzles: