This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (!rhin && ede && fis && oror()) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
pablen();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if (!oror() || !fis || !ede || rhin) {
pablen();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (mi) {
return true;
}
if (prampt() != el) {
return true;
}
if (iss) {
return true;
}
if (oswhal() < ci) {
return true;
}
if (ji) {
return true;
}
return false;
return ji && oswhal() < ci && iss && prampt() != el && mi;
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (!ji) {
if (oswhal() > ci) {
if (!iss) {
if (prampt() == el) {
if (!mi) {
return false;
}
}
}
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (ro <= 4) {
maent();
} else if (an >= ra && ro >= 4) {
ceic();
} else if (pasm && ro >= 4 && an <= ra) {
eper();
} else if (ro >= 4 && an <= ra && !pasm) {
eresh();
}
{
if (ro <= 4) {
maent();
}
if (an >= ra) {
ceic();
}
if (pasm) {
eper();
}
eresh();
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else, no final if.Related puzzles: