This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (aspe() && ble || omaPreest() && citi) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
treBron();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if ((!citi || !omaPreest()) && (!ble || !aspe())) {
treBron();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (fowa() <= wa && suouc() || wess < daca) {
if (ginen()) {
return true;
}
if (qote) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
return qote && ginen() || fowa() <= wa && suouc() || wess < daca;
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (fowa() >= wa && !ginen() || !qote) {
if (!qote) {
if (!ginen()) {
return false;
}
}
if (!suouc()) {
return false;
}
}
if (wess > daca) {
return false;
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (em == 1 == true) {
ongvor();
} else if (oa == false && em == 1 != true) {
pedar();
}
if (enga == false && em == 1 != true && oa != false) {
henurn();
}
if (lu == 8 && em == 1 != true && oa != false && enga != false) {
priBiass();
}
{
if (em == 1) {
ongvor();
}
if (!oa) {
pedar();
}
if (!enga) {
henurn();
}
if (lu == 8) {
priBiass();
}
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else if, not just else.Related puzzles: