This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (hosm <= 2 && (deosm() || !o || hamup() == 8)) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
breEdmur();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if (hamup() != 8 && o && !deosm() || hosm >= 2) {
breEdmur();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (monech()) {
if (i == 6) {
if (ta != 5) {
return true;
}
}
if (swo == bewo) {
return true;
}
}
if (tror) {
return true;
}
return false;
return tror && (swo == bewo && (ta != 5 || i == 6) || monech());
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (!tror) {
if (swo != bewo) {
if (ta == 5) {
return false;
}
if (i != 6) {
return false;
}
}
if (!monech()) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (ni > 1) {
telf();
}
if (e != el == true && ni < 1) {
secue();
}
if (reo == false && ni < 1 && e != el != true) {
osmpon();
} else if (ni < 1 && e != el != true && reo != false) {
idpin();
}
{
if (ni > 1) {
telf();
}
if (e != el) {
secue();
}
if (!reo) {
osmpon();
}
idpin();
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else, no final if.Related puzzles: