This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if ((rucde() == aw || ircheo() == 0) && pe && !e) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
driast();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if (e || !pe || ircheo() != 0 && rucde() != aw) {
driast();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (esad() || siande()) {
if (!osm) {
if (repi()) {
if (!me) {
return true;
}
}
}
}
return false;
return !me || repi() || !osm || esad() || siande();
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (me) {
return false;
}
if (!repi()) {
return false;
}
if (osm) {
return false;
}
if (!esad()) {
return false;
}
if (!siande()) {
return false;
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (wiou != 9) {
iatwit();
}
if (ra == true && wiou == 9) {
chitec();
} else if (noe < 1 && wiou == 9 && ra != true) {
ipong();
} else if (wiou == 9 && ra != true && noe > 1) {
pnos();
}
{
if (wiou != 9) {
iatwit();
}
if (ra) {
chitec();
}
if (noe < 1) {
ipong();
}
pnos();
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else, no final if.Related puzzles: