This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (!(e && esm < tras) || !(milel() || o)) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
smam();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if ((milel() || o) && e && esm < tras) {
smam();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (be <= raoul() || u) {
if (id) {
return true;
}
}
if (psoSolcur() <= me) {
return true;
}
if (li) {
return true;
}
return false;
return li && psoSolcur() <= me && (id || be <= raoul() || u);
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (psoSolcur() >= me || !li) {
if (!id) {
return false;
}
if (be >= raoul()) {
return false;
}
if (!u) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (i == true) {
cesGelrul();
} else if (aism == false && i != true) {
ganloc();
} else if (au == pi && i != true && aism != false) {
ragle();
}
if (i != true && aism != false && au != pi) {
rhopad();
}
{
if (i) {
cesGelrul();
}
if (!aism) {
ganloc();
}
if (au == pi) {
ragle();
}
rhopad();
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else, no final if.Related puzzles: