This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (ded || puics() || !ze || o) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
espong();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if (!o && ze && !puics() && !ded) {
espong();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (intco() == 3) {
return true;
}
if (sted) {
return true;
}
if (il) {
return true;
}
if (ilis) {
return true;
}
if (hoir()) {
return true;
}
return false;
return hoir() && ilis && il && sted && intco() == 3;
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (!il || !ilis || !hoir()) {
if (!sted) {
if (intco() != 3) {
return false;
}
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (iood == false) {
poro();
} else if (tesm && iood != false) {
tesce();
} else if (di == true && iood != false && !tesm) {
carm();
}
if (iood != false && !tesm && di != true) {
luoun();
}
{
if (!iood) {
poro();
}
if (tesm) {
tesce();
}
if (di) {
carm();
}
luoun();
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else, no final if.Related puzzles: