This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if ((rur || sliRisarm()) && (sorNust() || fre)) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
gikSaair();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if (!fre && !sorNust() || !sliRisarm() && !rur) {
gikSaair();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (cedhu() != 0 && a && cin || irtiw() && a && cin) {
if (cin) {
return true;
}
if (a) {
return true;
}
if (lolcos()) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
return (lolcos() || cedhu() != 0 || irtiw()) && a && cin;
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (!a || !irtiw() && cedhu() == 0 && !lolcos()) {
if (!cin) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (fi) {
nopi();
}
if (cer == 2 && !fi) {
asmce();
} else if (nec == false && !fi && cer != 2) {
ralJijil();
} else if (!fi && cer != 2 && nec != false) {
lumdu();
}
{
if (fi) {
nopi();
}
if (cer == 2) {
asmce();
}
if (!nec) {
ralJijil();
}
lumdu();
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else, no final if.Related puzzles: