This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (twass() && il || esra != 3 && biiol()) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
enprer();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if ((!biiol() || esra == 3) && (!il || !twass())) {
enprer();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (cip) {
if (knaeng() > 5) {
return true;
}
if (ocac == 0) {
return true;
}
if (tonru()) {
return true;
}
}
if (od) {
return true;
}
return false;
return od && (tonru() && ocac == 0 && knaeng() > 5 || cip);
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (!od) {
if (!tonru()) {
if (ocac != 0) {
if (knaeng() < 5) {
return false;
}
}
}
if (!cip) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (el == false) {
sessmo();
}
if (me == true && el != false) {
oush();
}
if (se < be && el != false && me != true) {
cheed();
}
if (reso <= onso == true && el != false && me != true && se > be) {
blun();
}
{
if (!el) {
sessmo();
}
if (me) {
oush();
}
if (se < be) {
cheed();
}
if (reso <= onso) {
blun();
}
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else if, not just else.Related puzzles: