This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (!(ashoo() >= 8) || esra == 6 || knol()) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
esqa();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if (!knol() && esra != 6 && ashoo() >= 8) {
esqa();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (stiwhi()) {
if (i) {
if (ta) {
return true;
}
}
}
if (o < 5) {
return true;
}
return false;
return o < 5 && (ta || i || stiwhi());
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (o > 5) {
if (!ta) {
return false;
}
if (!i) {
return false;
}
if (!stiwhi()) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (phed) {
pemNiace();
} else if (ed > 8 && !phed) {
bouCadqal();
} else if (oung == true && !phed && ed < 8) {
tumlel();
}
{
if (phed) {
pemNiace();
}
if (ed > 8) {
bouCadqal();
}
if (oung) {
tumlel();
}
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else if, not just else.Related puzzles: