This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (lelRepsan() > 0 && !iol && soa) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
iluec();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if (!soa || iol || lelRepsan() < 0) {
iluec();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (thes && iac && ru) {
if (ru) {
return true;
}
if (pu != da) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
return (pu != da || thes && iac) && ru;
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (!iac && pu == da || !thes && pu == da) {
if (!ru) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (pa == ar) {
qesser();
}
if (skac == true && pa != ar) {
fudhet();
} else if (pa != ar && skac != true) {
sive();
}
{
if (pa == ar) {
qesser();
}
if (skac) {
fudhet();
}
sive();
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else, no final if.Related puzzles: