This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (tu && (ma > 0 || sasAdia() > 4)) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
niad();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if (sasAdia() < 4 && ma < 0 || !tu) {
niad();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (le != 2 && fuxcor() || poosm()) {
if (poosm()) {
if (fuxcor()) {
return true;
}
}
if (!as) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
return (!as || le != 2) && (fuxcor() || poosm());
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (le == 2 && as) {
if (!fuxcor()) {
return false;
}
if (!poosm()) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (cla == true) {
prassa();
} else if (ra >= 8 && cla != true) {
gedath();
}
if (di != 9 && cla != true && ra <= 8) {
assmi();
}
{
if (cla) {
prassa();
}
if (ra >= 8) {
gedath();
}
if (di != 9) {
assmi();
}
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else if, not just else.Related puzzles: