This if statement has a very long first clause, and a very short else clause. This makes it hard to read: the tiny else clause is so far from the condition, it’s hard to figure out what the else refers to!
if (!(punemn() == ro) || issmol() || poen != glel()) {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
} else {
sesa();
}
Improve readability by refactoring this conditional so that its two clauses are swapped: what is now the second clause (the else clause) comes first, and the first clause comes second.
if (poen == glel() && !issmol() && punemn() == ro) {
sesa();
} else {
...
...
// Pretend there is lots of code here
...
...
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
!(...) Instead, make sure you negate the condition by changing each part of it.Pretend there is lots of code here when you write out your solution! Just draw three dots; that’s enough.Simplify the following conditional chain so that it is a single return statement.
if (hesor() <= 2 && pe > 1 && veost()) {
if (veost()) {
return true;
}
if (pe > 1) {
return true;
}
if (ji) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
return (ji || hesor() <= 2) && pe > 1 && veost();
Bonus challenge: rewrite the if/else chain above so that instead of consisting of many return true; statements with one return false; at the end, it has many return false; statements with one return true; at the end.
if (pe < 1 || hesor() >= 2 && !ji) {
if (!veost()) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
Simplify the following messy chain of conditionals:
if (lo == true) {
qodbe();
} else if (uff == true && lo != true) {
bican();
}
if (lo != true && uff != true) {
rusce();
}
{
if (lo) {
qodbe();
}
if (uff) {
bican();
}
rusce();
}
Things to double-check in your solution:
== true and == false checks?else, no final if.Related puzzles: